[zeroonetwothree]

When they rule for Trump it’s proof they are just a rubber stamp. When they rule against Trump it’s somehow also proof they are a rubber stamp?

[Refreeze5224]

SCOTUS rules for the rich and powerful. Most of the time Trump is aligned with them. Sometimes he does dumb shit like tariffs, or things that upset the order the rich and powerful want to maintain, and they rule against him.

[dylan604]

How do you get that from what I wrote?

[Petersipoi]

How do you not see how they got that from what you wrote?

[Dylan16807]

The argument is obviously that this is not enough to disprove rubber stamping.

"also proof" is a strawman, plain as day.

[tt24]

Is this a serious question? Hahah