[jmchuster]

> Famously, the first iPhone was actually expensive trash: no apps, no 3G, couldn't even cut and paste text.

Also famously, while the tech elitists complained about all of its shortcomings, the broader consumer market fully embraced it and it single-handedly drove an entirely new generation of consumer electronics.

[Lio]

I wouldn’t say trash.

For the record, it let you read the same web pages as a desktop computer over WiFi. It had a usable mapping app and good music app.

The rest of the experience, stuff like alarms, calculator, address book, etc. also worked nicely.

Those turned out to be things no one else was offering. I had a Nokia N95 at the time and the original iPhone was a big improvement on everything except the camera.

[stackghost]

Yes, as I wrote initially: the iPhone is a behemoth today, but its first version was underwhelming to say the least.

My point, which you seem to have overlooked, is that parent poster complaining that a "european iphone" doesn't exist is not realistic, considering how it went for Apple.

[shiroiuma]

The consumer market embraced it despite its shortcomings because it looked nice and was easy to use; the alternatives were not. Yeah, it didn't do that much, but it did more than a flip phone. The alternatives wanted you to use a stylus just to use your phone, and tried to basically recreate the MS Windows UI on a tiny screen; their UI was terrible.

[brabel]

I had a flip phone at the time and it certainly did more than the iPhone, but admittedly harder to use and not as good looking.