[jauntywundrkind]

There is a ton of work going into a Tauri based on CEF. https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/tree/feat/cef

My hope is this still acts like a library that multiple Tauri instances share. That would still have the upside of Tauri's shared library architecture (boo statically compiled programs, what a waste of precious ram!) while still letting us have a viable runtime. First app load might not be lightning fast but second app load is hopefully faster!! The OS webviews range from mediocre to absolute garbage; this to me would be a great improvement, that makes me happy!

[Ikryanov]

A Tauri app built on CEF (Chromium) is very similar to Electron (which also uses Chromium). The key difference is that Tauri uses Rust for the application’s business logic, whereas Electron uses JavaScript.

In this case I don't know why I should use Tauri instead of Electron.

[jauntywundrkind]

My understanding is that the tauri CEF will use shared libraries where-as every Electron instance has its own copy of Chrome.

That's the whole point of my post: we get a relatively up to date Chrome and we get a shared library that all Tauri apps can share! Hence why I discussed why running n+1 apps should have lower overhead.

So it seems much much much better than Electron to me. Electron values the app developer, wants to give them assurances that the chromium is the exact specified chromium version, and bundles it. I get it, the world is complex and clamping down is a natural response, but this conservatism has given Electron its deservedly bad reputation, and Tauri's slightly shifted stance alleviates so much pain.