[MillionOClock]

If you look at this tweet [1] and in particular responses under it, it still seems to me like some parts of it need additional clarification. For instance, I have seen some people interpret the tweet as meaning using the OAuth token is actually ok for personal experimentation with the Agent SDK, which can be seen as a slight contradiction with what you quoted. A parent tweet also mentioned the docs clean up causing some confusion.

None of this is legal advice, I'm just trying to understand what exactly is allowed or not.

[1] https://x.com/trq212/status/2024212380142752025?s=10

[adastra22]

Read the actual ToS. What you describe is NOT allowed.

[eclipxe]

That tweet is from a product leader on Claude Code itself...

[kahnclusions]

A tweet is not a ToS.

[AlotOfReading]

Then they should speak to legal about fixing the ToS before making public statements about their intentions with it. It won't look good to show up at arbitration and have to explain why your public comms contradict your ToS.