|
|
|
|
|
by Arch485
124 days ago
|
|
I've heard this sentiment a lot, that governments/secret agencies/whoever create zero-days intentionally, for their own use. This is an interesting thought to me (like, how does one create a zero-day that doesn't look intentional?) but the more I think about it, the more I start to believe that this fully is not necessary. There are enough faulty humans and memory unsafe languages in the loop that there will always be a zero-day somewhere, you just need to find it. (this isn't to say something like the NSA has never created or ordered the creation of a backdoor - I just don't think it would be in the form of an "unintentional" zero-day exploit) |
|
However, exploits that are known (only) by a state actor would most definitely be a closely guarded secret. It's only convenient for a state to release information about an exploit when either it's been made public or it has more consequences for not releasing.
So yes, exactly what you said. It's easier to find the exploits than to create them yourself. By extrapolation, you would have to assume that each state maintains its set of secret exploits, possibly never getting to use them for fear of the other side knowing of their existence. Cat & Mouse, Spy vs Spy for sure.