|
|
|
|
|
by cies
116 days ago
|
|
You say: > No, he did not Then you continue saying he did say it, but explained himself later (after it came out) in a way that makes his earlier statement void. "Plausible deniability" I'm not anti-vax, I'm critical. This C19-jab was risky and had little to no benefits. That's obvious. Even the Epstein files (probably you also think that those are merely a conspiracy) mention then covid response was orchestrated. I know some really wealthy people and many of them did not take it. Not sure if they go by the definition of plutocrat. You are conned by the pushed narrative: so naive. |
|
Good day.