|
|
|
|
|
|
by plagiarist
126 days ago
|
|
|
It's not actually thinking, though. There's no way for it to "know" it will be wrong because it wasn't trained on content covering that. Maybe in the future companies making the models will train them specifically on when to require a source of true randomness and they might start writing code for it. |
|
|
That may well be, I genuinely don't know. However, consider the following thought experiment:
Ask a random stranger on the street[*] to "generate a random password" and observe their behaviour. Are they whipping out their Python interpreter or just giving you a string of characters?
Now ask yourself whether this random stranger is capable of thought.
I think it's pretty clear that the former is a poor test for the latter.
[*] someplace other than Silicon Valley :)