|
|
|
|
|
|
by altmanaltman
127 days ago
|
|
|
Nothing about LLMs is random, how is this not common sense? If you prompt it the same prompt 50 times, it'll always converge towards the most plausible answer in its training based on probability, and most of them will follow the first pattern. The paper mentions using different chats for each of the 50 prompts and using the first password suggested and then finding similarities between them. Would it be the same if the LLM had context and did not always have to use a new chat? I highly doubt it. Overall, yeah don't generate passwords with LLMs but is this really a surprise that answers are simillar for the same prompt in every new chat with a LLM? |
|
|