Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sdfhbdf 116 days ago
The product that this article is advertising seems to be pretty inaccurate and their marketing seems to be burying that information.

The big copy on the front page says:

> Your Apple Watch *tracks* VO2 Max—one...

While you have to read through FAQ where you see:

> The watch *estimates* your cardio fitness during outdoor activities and stores it in Apple Health, which our app reads automatically.

All emphasis are mine.

I think it's a little disingenuous to sell this as "Your VO2 Max, finally visible" when it's actually just an estimate from a watch, based on biomarkers. When the real VO2 is measured in a lab with a more involved equipment.

A 2025 validation study involving 30 participants found that Apple Watch underestimated VO2 max by a mean of 6.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.77–8.38) when compared to indirect calorimetry, the gold standard method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 13.31%, and the limits of agreement showed considerable variability ranging from -6.11 to 18.26 mL/kg/min [1]. Another 2024 study found similar results, with the Apple Watch Series 7 showing a MAPE of 15.79% and poor reliability (ICC = 0.47) [2].

[1]: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjourn...

[2]: https://biomedeng.jmir.org/2024/1/e59459

1 comments

yeah there's no reliable way to measure VO2 max without breathing into tubes.
There's (vo2master) device that can apparently measure it in one breath; there was a video on some swimmer using it on turnaround without much interference with their exercise. $7k though.