|
|
|
|
|
by zephen
124 days ago
|
|
> You'd be surprised. People discern things of value from a one-time viewing of another person constantly. True. I overstated my case a bit. Of course, no matter what they are wearing, it is something that exists in their wardrobe, but that may or may not matter. > studies show the gaydar exists This, I know from experience. I had a gay roommate once, and he taught he how to spot them, way back when they were still trying to be a bit unobvious. But, even though gay people usually dress better and in certain ways, that's not the usual tell. It's really not about the clothes. > doesn't have to be accurate all the time to exist and be usable This is paradigmatic "system 1" thinking. We all use it, but sometimes the failures are catastrophic. |
|