|
|
|
Ask HN: How do companies that use Cursor handle compliance?
|
|
9 points
by Poomba
129 days ago
|
|
I'm trying to decide whether to adopt Cursor for our company, but we're in a heavily regulated industry and our compliance team is flagging concerns about HIPAA/SOC2/audit trails. The thing is, there are companies in regulated industries using it [1][2]. But Cursor has no HIPAA BAA, no FedRAMP certification, and is cloud-only with all requests routing through their AWS infrastructure. (This is probably true for Claude and other coding assistants, though I've only looked seriously at Cursor.) So how are regulated companies actually making this work? Or do most just avoid Cursor and other AI coding tools altogether? [1] 165 healthcare companies use Cursor according to Bloomberry: https://bloomberry.com/data/cursor/ [2] Cursor's customers include Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, and Neuralink: https://cursor.com/customers |
|
If your developer machines don’t have access to regulated data, neither will Cursor. As far as I know none of those compliance frameworks have anything to do with your code, it’s about accessing data and how you promote your code to production
I’ve never used cursor. But Claude Code gives you the option of using AWS Bedrock hosted models - including Anthropomorphic. You can sign a BAA with AWS. Notice this is using Anthropic models through an AWS account - not directly from Anthropic.