|
|
|
|
|
by ClintEhrlich
119 days ago
|
|
Yes, that is actually the next thing we are shipping! We have heard from a ton of OpenClaw users that the biggest barrier to them getting everything they want out of their agents is that memory is not a solved problem. LCM could be a great solution to that. Stay tuned -- will ship it ASAP. |
|
1 - global namespace - for the gateway agent/coordinator - would make inspecting results of subagent tasks much more safe and efficient, and all the benefits of precision across compaction boundaries for the main chat thread. I could see giving the subagents access to it, or just prompting them fresh and storing results in the global memory - probably the second is better.
2 - permissioned memory spaces - stuff that a given subagent should know without giving them global memory access. Then a gateway could mark some stuff ‘available’ as part of prompting.
This would be a super useful set of primitives - from reading the paper, I think you could do this relatively cheaply, maybe a tagging system for branches/nodes in the DAG. openclaw keeps some sort of track of what subagents should have access to already in the form of skills, but I haven’t looked into the actual permissions architecture.