|
|
|
|
|
by troad
129 days ago
|
|
>> It's a gross hack *taps on the name of this site* If I'm writing some cross-platform bit of software, my interest in supporting Windows is naturally in producing binaries that run on Windows. Why on earth should I give a flying toss how "almost all Windows software is developed", or which kinds of ABIs are BillG-kissed and approved? Good god. Talk about fetishising process over outcome. |
|
If your focus is on outcome that I promise and assure you that using MinGW will make producing a positive outcome significantly harder and more frustrating.
With modern Clang there really isn’t a justifiable reason to use MinGW.