|
|
|
|
|
by somewhereoutth
128 days ago
|
|
Agreed. Many of the suggestions are pretty much code it yourself, but without actually tapping the individual keys. Furthermore, and more generally, one of the great things about (traditional) coding is that it allows 'thinking through making' - by building something you learn more about the problem and thus how best to solve it. Code generation just leaves you with reviewing, which is less powerful in this way I believe. See also 'thinking through writing [prose]'. |
|
It doesn't mean those tools do not have value though but they're not capable of "coding ", in the sense we mean in the industry, and generating code isn't coding.