| But why? In this synthesized machine states era do I want to still run a bloated, buggy web browser? I think I will keep working on synthesizing a replacement for the desktop metaphor of a blank viewport/canvas and sampling from a model of vision data, tweaking at the edge when labels are missing or wrong, edges don't align, saving it back to model Think "boot to Blender" or Unreal Engine, synthesizing desktop and text files and such inside that environment There is increasingly little reason to import all the state of legacy software beyond a minimal Linux distribution Prompt to binary is on the way, skipping the generation of the intermediary code layer altogether Code is legacy technology from the 1950s era of using machines; arbitrary syntax for labeling with human context the use case of a memory address No reason the labeling has to be at the machine level. That can be vectors and labels of human value applied right to what's shown onscreen What tech people should be focused on is political action that keeps hardware open and models open and not locked behind data center. Software dev as we knew it is already over technology wise, social acceptance has yet to propagate, but social acceptance is an eventually consistent system. It’ll happen |
I do. The browser is indispensable, at least for now, and it's much better to keep improving it for the age of AI than to jump to fairy tails and unproven replacement technologies.
> What tech people should be focused on is political action that keeps hardware open and models open and not locked behind data center.
And while they're working on this, you're going to do what exactly? You made a lot of forward looking claims that have nothing to do with the present reality, you just forgot to present any realistic vision about how to get there.
If you can't imagine procuring any those pink unicorns yourself why do you plead with others to deliver them to you? It just doesn't add up.