|
|
|
|
|
|
by yakshaving_jgt
129 days ago
|
|
|
> Why would understanding his argument necessarily mean finding it persuasive or exhaustive? Alexis King is a woman. > that languages with rich DX around rigid typing encourage an architecture that's rigidly typed, and that rigidly typed codebases tend to come up against predictable issues. I agree with neither of these points. |
|
|
Fair pick up! I never read bylines, so I ought to stick to gender neutral pronouns.
> I agree with neither of these points.
Perfectly reasonable. I'm not going to imply you're ignorant for disagreeing.