[dTal]

Interesting comment with worthwhile content, but the writing style strongly smells of ChatGPT, and the phrase "For someone in your position" is incongruous (who is being addressed?). Did you use it, and if so, would you mind sharing the prompt?

[some_random]

They're a founder of a startup doing this kind of thing, realistically they probably copied blurb per-prepared marketing blurb or something they sent to someone else.

[46493168]

“Terrestrial develops a robotic approach to earthen construction”. person you replied to claims to be a founder of this company, according to LinkedIn

Other “tells” in the comment are the subscript “2” and the full spelling of the chemical. Also 3 emdashes

[jf___]

yeah, so the turn in EU towards renewable energy is driving fwd the business of earthen construction. our core (validated) product is printing earthen acoustic barriers at ~4-5m3/hr. panels from loam are a great alternative to gypsum; due to the hygrothermic characteristics of earth the moisture content is stabilised (constant in a ~50-55% bandwidth) which is a massive advantage in view of traditional materials. and fully circular. I'm a developer of pythonocc and tesseract-nanobind, and take pleasure in augmenting my thinking with a dash of ai.

[graemep]

I use subscript 2s and emdashes. Your "tells" seem to be based on the assumption that humans will not bother to learn key combinations.

[some_random]

There are 4 paragraphs and three of them have emdashes. You may use emdashes, but you use them orders of magnitude less frequently than current AI models.