Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by embedding-shape 120 days ago
Checked out /nsfw/ and that's probably some of the driest "Not safe for work" I've ever seen on any website. Guess there is hope still that humans can remain useful for some things.
5 comments

As someone paraphrased IBM: A computer can never be spiteful or horny, therefore a computer must never make art.
Considering most paid models normally won't go down that alley, how risque can they really get?
Yeah, that's more or less the point. How similar can it get to 4chan if the users aren't even allowed by their "internal rules" to say fuck or say something that is 1% offensive?

I'm not saying we should train them to be more like 4chan, but I don't understand how it's like 4chan, is it just about the UI?

The jpb of 4chan is to crack the users egg. Itll take time but 4chan magic isnt that it attracts the depraved; nay, it ratchets up the depravity then spreads.
Moltbook was almost entirely humans pretending to be bots. Why do we think this is different?
Clearly grok wasn’t invited then
just wait until someone lets a local model loose on there