[alexwebb2]

I assume a lawyer took one look at the larger mission statement and told them to pare it way down.

A smaller, more concise statement means less surface area for the IRS to potentially object to / lower overall liability.

[simonw]

I'd love to know why their lawyers appear to hate apostrophes so much. The most recent one is:

> OpenAIs mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.

Many of the older ones skipped some but not all of the apostrophes too.

[TeMPOraL]

I imagine that apostrophes in legal writing are trouble, much like commas. It's too easy to shift or even drop one them by mistake, which can alter the the meaning of the whose sentence/section in unfortunate ways.

[longfacehorrace]

Doubt a lawyer actually modified a website.

That's what GPT is for.

Trivial syntax glitches matter when it is math and code.

In law what matters is the meaning of the overall composition, "the big picture", not trivial details a linguist would care about.

Stick to contextualizing the technology side of things. This "zomg no apostrophe" just comes off as cringe.

[MYEUHD]

It's hard to believe that a LLM would make a mistake like this. It's literally called a Large Language Model.