Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hirako2000 131 days ago
If offering a tie in thing supposedly free of charge without warning that would end once it serves a party less profit purpose then yes.

Ethics are not obligations, they are moral principles. Not having principles doesn't send you to prison that is why it isn't law. It makes you lose moral credit though.
3 comments
kube-system 131 days ago
That is ridiculous. If you buy a sandwich for a homeless person, you do not need to warn them that you won't give them another one tomorrow. If you think generosity is an obligation of slavery, you have your morals backwards.

However, almost every open source license actually DOES warn that support may end. See the warranty clause.

https://github.com/minio/minio/blob/master/LICENSE#L587

link
hdjrudni 131 days ago
If you give them a free sandwich every day for 500 days.....yeah, you should probably tell them you're not coming tomorrow.
link
kube-system 131 days ago
Okay, well they did.
link
hirako2000 130 days ago
The parallel is what's ridiculous..because of the social understanding. Even if you face a sandwich every day, the offer could end anytime..a one off surely doesn't set expectations.

With open source it does. If an indie open sources and get a baby or lose interest, it is understood as fair to suddenly stop maintenance.

When a company surfs on the open source wave to get contributions, grow penetration, then smoothly slows maintenance and announces to get a license, that's gaming the open source community.

See the numerous cases of popular open source repo where the parent or new parent company took over to gain the user base without any respect for the maintenance if not development aspect: community fork and take over the community.

Mariadb, a more recent illustrative example of that is the hashicorp drama that occured when investors decided it was time to gear towards profit at the detriment of the community that largely contributed to the tools.

link
acdha 131 days ago
> If offering a tie in thing supposedly free of charge without warning that would end once it serves a party less profit purpose then yes

Claiming that you’re entitled to free R&D forever because someone once gave you something of value seems like a great way to ensure that nobody does that again. You got over a decade of development by a skilled team, it’s not exactly beyond the pale that the business climate has changed since then.

link
PKop 131 days ago
Those might be your moral principles, but others reject this nonsense of an obligation to perpetual free labor you think you're entitled to, and don't grant you this moral high ground you assume you have.
link