[jen729w]

Monodraw got an update the other week. It isn't being changed, but it doesn't need to.

Great little app. And it's $10, once. Hardly breaking the bank.

[orangecoffee]

But it's not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.

[GlacierFox]

Absolutely we should. But this one isn't FOSS.

[meatmanek]

https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE

[GlacierFox]

Why have you sent me the licence page for Monosketch? I'm commenting on comment about Monodraw...

[meatmanek]

Which of these two exchanges makes more sense?

1.

> But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.

> Absolutely we should. But [monodraw] isn't FOSS.

2.

> But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.

> Absolutely we should. But [monosketch] isn't FOSS.

The first interpretation makes no sense to me, because you've agreed completely with the parent comment but worded the comment in a way that sounds like you're disagreeing.

[lsaferite]

I would assume they sent that because they were suggesting to support FOSS over closed-source software.