|
|
|
|
|
by psanford
121 days ago
|
|
This "it has to be handwritten" stuff is nonsense. Do that if you enjoy it, but also you should acknowledge the downsides to it. I started keeping a work journal a few years ago and it has changed how I work for the better. It is just a text file. The main value of it is that I can search it! When I'm figuring something out for the first time, and I have a lot of trail and error, I write down what I did. And then I might not touch that thing again for 6 months. When I come back to it, it is unlikely that I will remember what I did exactly but because it is written down and searchable I can quickly recover my old state. I like this so much I also started a personal work journal for my home lab. It really is useful for me. But its primary value is that I can search it. |
|
From the submission:
"Should you use one?
Maybe! I can't answer that for you. "
There is a middle ground. Write on paper on the spot. Transcribe to digital form later. I've been doing it for many years. Painful, but now I just get an LLM to OCR my handwriting.
And oh, definitely - for me the brain works differently while typing vs handwriting.