[einr]

Not everything needs to have "traction", "excitement" or the biggest community. D is a useful, well designed programming language that many thousands of people in this vast world enjoy using, and if you enjoy it too, you can use it. Isn't that nice?

[4gotunameagain]

Oh a programming language certainly needs to have traction and community for it to succeed, or be a viable option for serious projects.

You can code your quines in whatever you'd like, but a serious project needs existence of good tooling, good libraries, proven track record & devs that speak the language.

[einr]

"Good tooling, good libraries, proven track record" are all relative concepts, it's not something you have or don't have.

There are serious projects being written in D as we speak, I'm sure, and the language has a track record of having been consistently maintained and improved since 2001, and has some very good libraries and tooling (very nice standard library, three independent and supported compiler implementations!) It does not have good libraries and tooling for all things; certainly integrations with other libs and systems often lag behind more popular languages, but no programming language is suitable for everything.

What I'm saying is there's a big world out there, not all programmers are burdened with having to care about CV-maxxing, community or the preferences of other devs, some of them can just do things in the language they prefer. And therefore, not everything benefits from being written in Rust or whatever the top #1 Most Popular! Trending! Best Choice for System Programming 2026! programming language of the week happens to be.

[cardanome]

D has three high quality compiler implementations. It has been around for ages and is very stable and has a proven track record.

Zig has one implementation and constant breaking changes.

D is the far more pragmatic and safer choice for serious projects.

Not that Zig is a bad choice but to say that a unstable lang in active development like Zig would be a better choice for "serious projects" compared to a very well established but less popular lang shows the insanity of hype driven development.

[fuzztester]

>Oh a programming language certainly needs to have traction and community for it to succeed, or be a viable option for serious projects.

You are totally right, sir.

>You can code your quines in whatever you'd like, but a serious project needs existence of good tooling, good libraries, proven track record & devs that speak the language.

Now, you HN user who calls yourself 4gotunameagain (which type of name is already a red flag for those in the know, because usually used by trolls), do us a favour by posting the link to at least one of your so-called serious projects here. Put your money where your mouth is.