[bGl2YW5j]

"Outperforms" ... how can performance be judged when it doesn't make sense to reduce the underlying "reasoning" to a well-known system? The law isn't black and white and is informed by so many things, one of which is the subjectivity of the judge.

[givemeethekeys]

A major component of being a judge is to be objective, given the facts.

[bGl2YW5j]

Yes, but whether they admit it or not, as humans subjectivity, whether informed by culture, opinion, experience, etc, creeps in. There's also variation in how a judge applies objective assessment to law; my interpretation of law may be different to someone else's.

[givemeethekeys]

I think we are discussing separate things. I'm talking about requirements and you're talking implementation. The requirement is for judges to be objective and impartial. Turns out AI does a better job of implementing the requirement than humans.