Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by chrisrogers 120 days ago
My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in.
1 comments

And its not just opt in for the camera owner/licensor it should be explicitly optin for anyone who gets recorded
In the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places.
I'm in the US. I have an expectation of privacy in public places.
I suppose you can expect whatever you want, but the law is not on your side.