|
|
|
|
|
|
by lutusp
120 days ago
|
|
|
> I doubt anyone could make a reply to this comment that would make me feel any better about it. You may be right, but just to have said it : the Fast Fourier Transform requires complex numbers. One can write a version that avoids complex numbers, but (a) its ugliness gives away what's missing, and (b) it's significantly slower in execution. Oh -- also -- e^(i Ⲡ) + 1 = 0 Nevertheless, you may be right. |
|
|