[mjr00]

> Concrete Media: Public Relations for B2B tech companies

This is a marketing piece for Concrete Media.

Whenever you see an article like this, be sure to ask yourself how the author came up with the idea for the article, and how the author got in contact with any people interviewed in the article.

[senko]

Should anyone think the comment is dismissive, here's this directly in the text:

> a respected public relations firm that often works with tech businesses covered by VentureBeat

[alabut]

At least they’re making some kind of minimal disclosure. So many of these fluff pieces have the same format PG complained about two decades ago:

https://paulgraham.com/submarine.html

[hypfer]

Exactly this.

The whole wording also doesn't make sense.

OpenClaw was released in November of 2025, yet the article sounds like NanoClaw _disrupts_ some old staple of the industry.

You can't use that wording 4 months into the whole "industry". Even less so, when your competitor was "launched" 2 weeks ago. Even less so when it's written by claude

This nothingburger is so much nothing, it might as well be an antiburger.

[bluejeans123]

yeah it reads like a sponsored post