[skydhash]

This is a non-problem. Git primary role is a VCS. What you decide to version is up to you.

On the main repo I like linear commits on the main branch where each is tied to a PR and a ticket number. On my local, how I work is relevant to no one except myself.

When I create a PR, I expect the reviewer to do a full review. If I update, it would be best to also do a full because that’s what will be applied. I believe, as a reviewer, you need to understand the full patch, not little snippets over days.

> Git just needs 2 separate mechanisms for these 2 different ideas

Git is distributed. What is shared between two instances are patches. These are immutables. If I was sent a set of patches that I would not accept for some reason, I would discard it and wait for an updated set of patches. What you propose should be good according to you, I don’t want days long back and forth.