[advisedwang]

I don't think it's prudish to want the ability to take down deepfakes of you naked or leaked images of you.

[Dylan16807]

Your comment has basically no connection to the comment you replied to. (Which itself had a weak connection to the article, but that's a separate issue.)

[cush]

The article is about removing non-consensual sexually explicit images and deepfakes

[ReptileMan]

And on whom falls the burden of proof that it is non-consensual or deepfake? We danced similar dance with DMCA takedowns.

[cush]

It’s a small change to an existing suite of features Google provides around preventing personal information from being exposed in search results.

https://myactivity.google.com/results-about-you/

The burden was always on the victims.

[Dylan16807]

The article is. mlindner's comment isn't.