[Nasrudith]

I strongly disagree. You should always write rules under the assumption it will get in the hands of the worst people. If there is a 'become god-emperor' lever in your supposedly democratic government system then it is a shitty system.

[XorNot]

Maybe so but what here really would've prevented this? The information involved is necessarily public: bank details and credit card numbers need to be shared otherwise why have them?

Writing a rule that says the government can't do this is just the government writing a rule it can simply remove it ignore when inconvenient.

[mulmen]

The banking information belongs to the account holder and the bank. Google knows it by coincidence but should not share it because it isn’t theirs. If the government wants to know my banking details they can ask my bank. If they can’t figure out who my bank is they should get better at investigating. This approach is just exploiting Google’s wide reach.

[Dylan16807]

No careful rulecrafting can survive the worst people being in charge.

[throwpoaster]

That’s the topic of the Federalist Papers. It’s been working for 2.5 centuries.

[reddozen]

Cool. Yeah but the topic is that it's currently not working when you have a president that doesn't want to respect rule of law.

Just like Roberts schizo-rambling about the federalist papers and inventing new terms like "Core constitutional powers" while not addressing any of the dissents. Roberts pens in that the president gets broad immunity for "core" (defined nowhere) powers and ignores the public's interest in not having a criminal president.

Originalists like senile Roberts must have forgot the framers were literally escaping a monarchy with no judicial accountability. Maybe him and Alito can figure out the mental gymnastics needed to ask his wife to take down the stop-the-steal flag outside his house.