|
|
|
|
|
by wqaatwt
135 days ago
|
|
> not achieving a similar population until the 1300s That’s not the necessarily best metric either, though. Roman city sizes (especially Rome itself) very inflated due to centralized state redirecting a lot of tax revenue there. However in premodern times pretty much all cities universally had negative population growth which would imply they weren’t particularly nice places to live if you had better options. |
|
Your point is well taken although I must point out that for the above to be true the cities could never exist in the first place.
Depending on where you put the cut-off point of "premodern" the contact between precolumbian and European cultures in North America had some notion that people on the European side would sometimes immigrate to Indian culture but not vice versa. "The Down of Everything" by Graeber and Wengrow [0] goes into transcultural impacts at length. A more original source can be found in a letter by Ben Franklin in 1753 [1]:
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dawn_of_Everything1. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/letter-to-peter...