|
|
|
|
|
|
by ragall
134 days ago
|
|
|
> for example, the engineer may be deciding whether to use a linked list or binary tree and the LLM is implementing it with the available code stack approved by the company At this point it's a slightly more sophisticated version of the IDE's "refactor tool". If, in addition to replacing "HashMap" with "LinkedList" in a bunch of places, it might also fix tests, then it's indeed useful but won't be worth paying much more for it. > A company that can successfully implement such an LLM opens up their talent pool from people who know their stack (or want to learn it) to people who know any stack Think about it: if the business usefulness of a tool is mostly in reducing onboarding time by even a 75%, it's not really that valuable. |
|
|