|
|
|
|
|
by simonw
131 days ago
|
|
I'm dabbling with Go at the moment for small tools, mainly as an excuse to learn a new language but also because having a single standalone binary is convenient for shuttling these tiny little tools around. ... but then I'm mostly running them with "uvx name-of-tool" because it turns out Python's packaging infrastructure for binary tools is so good! |
|
But I can definitely see how someone with `uv` muscle memory wants everything in the same command.
`uv` is the best thing that happened to the Python ecosystem since... I don't know... maybe Numpy.