[jmalicki]

I find that AI allows me to get into algorithm design more, and the intersection of math and programming more, by avoiding boilerplate.

You can indulge even more by letting AI take care of the easy stuff so you can focus on the hard stuff.

[zeroonetwothree]

What happens when the AI does the hard stuff as well?

[tjr]

As described above, I think with AI coding, our role shifts from "programmer" to "project manager", but even as a project manager, you can still choose to delegate some tasks to yourself. Whether if you want to do the hard stuff yourself, or the easy stuff, or the stuff that happens on Thursdays. It's not about what AI is capable of doing, but rather, what you choose to have it do.

[jmalicki]

SkyNet. When it can do the hard stuff, why do you think we'll still be around for project management and prompting? At that point, we are livestock.

[joquarky]

Look around. We have been livestock for at least a decade now.

In fact, we are worse. At least livestock are cared for.

[QuercusMax]

Here's an example from my recent experience: I've been building a bunch of mostly throwaway TUIs using AI (using Python and Rich), and a lot of the stuff just works trivially.

But there are some things where the AI just does not understand how to do proper boundary check to prevent busted layouts, and so I can either argue with it for an hour while it goes back and forth breaking the code in the process of trying to fix my layout issues - or I can just go in and fix it myself.