|
|
|
|
|
by kcplate
133 days ago
|
|
Sometimes the details betray the narrative. I believe even more strongly that this guy created his own mess after reading the ruling. https://www.universalhub.com/files/attachments/2026/culleton... There are quite a few missing but important details not in the news story. Apparently he complicated matters and put himself into a no win legal situation by choosing against applying for asylum. The “forged” signatures turned out to be a close match to checks that were provided to the court that he admitted to signing. He also admitted to the court that his memory was hazy around that time. There was also no need for immigration officials to forge his name on those documents because if he refused to sign the notice document it had the same legal result as if he did. SOP would be for an immigration official to simply indicate “refusal to sign” on the document. Unfortunately our laws don’t always protect us from ourselves. |
|