[sdf2erf]

I think your kind of missing the point.

Think about it from a resource (calorie) expenditure stand point.

Are you expending more resources on writing the prompts vs just doing without it? Thats the real question.

If you are expending more, which is what Simon is indicating at - are you really better off? Id argue not, given that this cant be sustained for hours on end. Yet the expectation from management might be that you should be able to sustain this for 8 hours.

So again, are you better off? Not in the slightest.

Many things in life are counter-intuitive and not so simple.

P.s. youre not getting paid more for increasing productivity if you are still expected to work 8 hrs a day... lmao. Thankfully im not a SWE.

[notanastronaut]

I think something a lot of people miss out on is that we're not all the same. We all have different internal thought models, whether it is a biological difference (ADHD brain?), educational differences, and overall abilities. And it seems a lot of people have this idea everyone uses "AI" the same way. That's a lack of lateral thinking. Making assumptions we're all burning "calories" in the same way implies we all think, and work, alike.

We are not alike.

[rybosworld]

I don't think I'm missing the point and respectfully, I think your reply is completely unrelated to anything that I said.

Whether you are "better off or not" is a separate topic, and I never suggested one way or the other.

Simon's point is that engineers can be so productive with these tools that it is tempting to work (much) longer.

[sdf2erf]

Simon: "I'm frequently finding myself with work on two or three projects running parallel. I can get so much done, but after just an hour or two my mental energy for the day feels almost entirely depleted."

Youre a time waster, stop posting and creating noise.

[rybosworld]

Time wasting would be not reading the comment I replied to, and then thinking I was replying to Simon/the article.

Does that sound familiar?