Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pwdisswordfishy 133 days ago
> What I would like to see is the ability to put a <pre-cache href="url"><![CDATA[...]]></pre-cache> that would allow the document to replace requests for url with the embedded data

multipart/related already exists.

1 comments

> multipart/related already exists.

Which web browsers render multipart/related correctly served over https?

What is stopping them from doing so instead of going with a NIH solution?

Never mind the context is e-mail, which is not served to a browser over HTTPS.

Got it: So none.

As to why I prefer one thing that doesn’t exist over another thing that doesn’t exist depends on my priors. You might as well be asking my opinion and making fun of it before you know the answer.

What do you think the impact would be if Content-Location: would be if it suddenly gained the interpretation I suggest?

What do you think a script in the package can do to reference a part of the URL is constructed by code?