[BudapestMemora]

"Until prompt-to-binary is reliable enough that nobody reads the intermediate code, the analogy doesn't hold."

1. OK, let's create 100 instances of prompt under the hood, 1-2 will hallucinate, 3-5 will produce something different from 90% of remaining, and it can compile based on 90% of answers

2. computer memory is also not 100% reliable , but we live with it somehow without man-in-the-middle manually check layer?

[whoisthemachine]

Computer memory, even cheap consumer grade stuff, has much higher reliability than 90%. Otherwise your computer would be completely unusable!

[Lwerewolf]

I wonder what ECC is for. So, unless you're Google and you're having to deal with "mercurial cores"...

Also, sorry, but what did I just actually attempt to read?

[zvitiate]

Okay but if you aren’t using RAIM or a TMR system then is he really wrong?

And if you weren’t being snarky I’m sure you could understand. Generate 100 answers. Compare them. You’ll find ~90% the same. Choose that one.