|
|
|
|
|
by killerstorm
137 days ago
|
|
You're missing the point. Consider this: Mathematicians use LLMs. Obviously, they don't trust LLM to do math. But LLM can help with formalizing a theorem, then finding a formal proof. It's usually a very tedious thing - but LLMs are _already_ quite good at that. In the end you get a proof which gets checked by normal proof-checking software (not LLM!), you can also inspect, break into parts, etc. You really need to look into detail rather than dismiss wholesale ("It made a math error so it's bad at math" is wrong.) |
|