[hackyhacky]

> In my experience, agentic LLMs tend to write code that is very branchy with cyclomatic complexity

You are missing the forest for the trees. Sure, we can find flaws in the current generation of LLMs. But they'll be fixed. We have a tool that can learn to do anything as well as a human, given sufficient input.

[JackSlateur]

We have heard that for years

"trust us, it will work soon .. we just need a bit more time and a couple more dozens billions of dollars .. just trust us, bro .."

[hackyhacky]

> We have heard that for years

LLMs have been a thing for about three years now, so you can't have been hearing this for very long. In those three years, the rate of progress has been astounding and there is no sign of slowing down.

[JackSlateur]

And god knows that we have heard that a lot in just 3 years.