[3vidence]

Every day I feel closer to leaving this industry when I see articles like this.

Is software even a real industry with patterns, safety, design, performance, review, etc.

Or are we just a hype generating machine that's happy to ship the most broken stuff possible the fastest.

Why do we have to constantly relearn the same lessons.

[alainrk]

I suggest to read the full article :)

[3vidence]

The thesis of the article is that software other people have built is bad (frameworks) but software my LLM agent is good (for undisclosed reasons).

I think it just adds to the noise of our industry that reusable patterns and standards don't matter

[alainrk]

Strawman argument.

Standards and patterns matter, but discernment matters more. The issue isn't reusability itself, it's the cargo-cult adoption of frameworks that solve problems you don't have, when you don't have them.

Your LLM agent works for undiscussed reasons because you made deliberate architectural choices for your specific context. That's engineering. Blindly importing a framework just because "everyone uses it" is the opposite. That's the point, nothing more nothing less.