|
|
|
|
|
by ryannielsen
4981 days ago
|
|
So, what exactly is untrue about what I said? Potentially nothing, but it is all anecdotal. Where's the widespread or researched evidence of HFS (especially in its HFS+ or HFSX variants) being a slow and easily corruptible file system? It's not like HFS is a rare and infrequently used file system – it's the primary filesystem for all Macs since System 3, for many iPods, and for all iOS devices. The scaling limits present in HFS+ will rarely be hit by most users and, while not as resilient as more modern FSs, there are no inherent fatal design flaws with HFS that I'm aware of. Perhaps you've pushed HFS+ beyond its limits, or have usage patterns that trigger a rare fatal bug, but just claiming that something is true is not very productive either. |
|