|
|
|
|
|
by mothballed
139 days ago
|
|
Not thrilled about it, and I personally would rather see them repealed. I will concede compelled speech impositions have been interpreted more generously when they are commercial. I don't necessarily agree with it, but even if we concede they can happen, I hope that distinction is made for commercial vs non-commercial content. Though I'm not thrilled with it happening for either. |
|
Ads should be marked, ingredients and components should be listed.
What possible reason would there be for a viewer/customer to not be allowed to find out such obvious info?