[blmarket]

Some pattern I found from my hobby project.

1. Keep things small and review everything AI written, or 2. Keep things bloated and let AI do whatever it wants within the designated interface.

Initially I drew this line for API service / UI components, but it later expanded to other domains. e.g. For my hobby rust project I try to keep "trait"s to be single responsible, never overlap, easy to understand etc etc. but I never look at AI generated "impl"s as long as it passes some sensible tests and conforming the traits.

[rustyhancock]

I'm finding Rust is perfect for me with LLMs.

I find rust generally easier to reason about, but can't stand writing it.

The compiler works well with LLMs plenty of good tooling and LSPs.

If I'm happy with the shape of the code and I usually write the function signatures/ Module APIs. And the compiler is happy with it compiling. Usually the errors if any are logical ones I should catch in reviews.

So I focus on function, compiler focuses on correctness and LLM just does the actual writing.

[bwestergard]

Do you think Rust will end up getting a boost from LLM adoption?

[rustyhancock]

It definitely has for me! I just replied to the parent explaining why.

Tl;Dr I don't mind reading rust I hate writing it and the compiler meets me in the middle.

[gck1]

Same here. I had to do a lot of being in the loop with Python, but with rust - compiler gives Claude all the information it may need and then it figures things out without me.

Writing rust scares me, but I can read it just fine. I've come up with super masochistic linting rules that claude isn't allowed to change and that has improved things quite a bit.

I wish there was a mature framework for frontend that can be configured to be as strict as rust.