|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
126 days ago
|
|
|
The phrasing of your first two sentences in your first post makes it sound like you're dismissing the security issue. For saying that it's a real security issue and then another issue on top you should word it very differently. |
|
|
Genuine question, How does it sound like I'm dismissing it? My first sentence begins with the the phrase
> I don't like that the executable's update URL is using just plain HTTP
And my second sentence
> Whether you agree with whether this rule should be out-of-scope or not is a separate issue.
which, with context that AMD reported MITM as out-of-scope, clearly indicates that I think of it as an issue, albeit, a separate one from the one the author already reported.