| > None of the highest up were sent to jail. CEOs perfectly fine taking responsibility for the profits, but what happened to taking responsibility for the fraud they enabled? > > Literally dozens of CEOs went to jail, which is again why I think this may be the biggest ball-drop of the media this century The GP's remark is centered around the *sentiment* that none of the C-suite / execs in the Big Banks (Merrill, Goldman, BoA, Citi) were jailed for their involvement / excessive speculation in the 2008 crisis. The keywords there being "Big Banks": If it's a national household name, OR if their positions are coveted by finance employees, it's a Big Bank. Otherwise, it's not a Big Bank. > > > Your Google skills may need some work because this is the first result for "bank CEO jailed by TARP": 1) This is a goalpost shift from "bank CEOs jailed for causing / excessively speculating up to the 2008 crisis". 2) TARP was established as a result of the crisis (i.e. AFTER it happened), and therefore cannot be used to mark execs that were jailed for their involvement / excessive speculation in the 2008 crisis. 3) "TARP defraudment" is a different matter, and not "Causing the 2008 crisis" or "excessive speculation" > > > https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/atlanta/press-releases/201... The case cited only tangentially involves TARP, when the bulk of the case was about the President of FirstCity Bank & his associates defrauding the bank with loans that *they themselves had involvement in*. |