[hnriot]

This might be a good strategy - the skill set required to get a company off the group is very different from long term growth and sustainability. By exiting, the skills are compartmentalized. I worked for a company that made networking products, at the time they were ahead of Cisco's tech, but Cisco had by far better penetration into the CIO world. The sales cycle was too long for a small startup and we practically ran out of money just waiting for companies to evaluate our product. It was clear that the company would do far better inside an existing sales infrastructure, so we exited and moved on to things we did best.

Not building a company for the long haul isn't necessarily a bad thing, provided the business itself has the ability to grow elsewhere.