Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by methoddk 4984 days ago
This is hardly front page worthy hacker news.
5 comments

Michael Arrington returns to Techcrunch, and with pretty high correlation, "this isn't hacker news" comments return to HN.
Because it isn't. Who writes for TechCrunch is not front page worthy news.

EDIT: There always seems to be some air of schoolboy drama surrounding TechCrunch.

For example:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2011/sep/15/techcrunch-a...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505124_162-43452680/techcrunch-d...

And I'm sure that this news will spur some, too. Who cares?

But what Arrington is up to is worth noting.

Regardless of anyone's opinion of him, he's been a big factor in shaping the startup press world.

I'm more amazed it's still trendy for geeks to hate on the people in tech media. Though that would have passed on like platform shoes and bell bottoms by now.
Not hating on all the people in tech media. I'm hating on two specific people in tech media. Two people who, in my experience reading their material, are biased and their opinions shouldn't hold as much weight as they do.

Do you really think that it is okay that they are allowed to be in journalism in an area where they both have financial stake in companies they report on?

Two people who, in my experience reading their material, are biased and their opinions shouldn't hold as much weight as they do.

Everyone's biased. Read any political editorial. They are clear with their biases. There's a slant to everything you have a personal investment in (whether financial or just sheer interest in the topic). Truly objective journalism is very rare nowadays. An ersatz veneer of objectivity is common but that's more insidious, IMHO.

Do you really think that it is okay that they are allowed to be in journalism in an area where they both have financial stake in companies they report on?

If they disclose it, yes. Journalism is no sacred cow. It's as scummy and scabby as any industry. The fact they disclose their conflicts of interest puts them above any journalist who has been taken for dinner or drinks by a PR flack or big company or flown out on a press junket (pathetically common, rarely disclosed to readers).

It's good to know that I need to get my guard up higher, as his return may up the ante on not only TechCrunch's reporting style, but also those of its competitors as well.
It clearly is, hn is about startups and tech, and that's exactly what MA writes about, he's a character in the SV world, just like CEO's of companies and 'star' programmers (Torvalds et al)

hn is as much about the personalities as it is the products and companies.

I really don't think the return of two seriously biased writers to an already biased media company is important. Sorry.
If Michael Arrington returning to TechCrunch isn't HN-worthy news, I don't know what is!
Given that (IMO, rather unfortunately) Techcrunch stories are posted and upvoted to the front page on a daily basis, this is also front page worthy.