|
|
|
|
|
by dccoolgai
134 days ago
|
|
I read it more as "look for the thing that was _never done_ because no one was going to hire 20 people to do it" and all the examples were pointing out how you _should not_ try to "better, faster, cheaper" AI because you will lose quickly on all those dimensions. I realize the irony, of course, that this article is AI-generated but it provoked something close to an epiphany for me even so. |
|