|
|
|
|
|
|
by JPLeRouzic
134 days ago
|
|
|
Thank you for this insight. Yet does your conclusion contradict your premises? "It just sees frequency. It digests without tasting. And then you land on the page and it says: phenomenological convergence. That's a collision. Because phenomenology is the opposite operation. Husserl's whole move was to un-merge — to strip away exactly the habitual pairings" "The form is the thesis." |
|
|